Re: VR schema proposal - need some help

Hi Aaron,

Any more progress towards your VR schema proposal ?

-Thad
+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:46 PM Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thad,
>
> Makes sense to me to have a different group of properties to support MR
> (AR/VR) application.
>
> Ie: AR logo (Bit like ico or flavicon) (denoted with a recommended
> formats, types and sizes in either 2d or 3d formats).
>
> Which may be a property under MrMediaObjects
>
> Or something else so we don't have people complaining about patriarchal
> terminology...?!
>
> Tim.h.
>
>
> On Thu., 29 Jun. 2017, 4:54 am Thad Guidry, <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Aaron,
>>
>> OK, right in that case its still a MediaObject.
>>
>> But since this object is used in the VR industry, which is still
>> developing and new formats and new containers are still being created all
>> the time, we will need to surface those common properties, as Vicki says,
>> into a new Type for the industry to utilize.  Just don't lose sight of how
>> the Broadcasting industry also deals with containers and formats that are
>> very similar in your use case, is all I am asking :)  (your VRObject might
>> just be a container format that becomes an industry standard later on, and
>> that's fine also)
>>
>> To answer your previous previous questions, Yes currently its fine to say
>> that a particular MediaObject or VRObject can contain many parts such as
>> many ImageObject's
>> You can currently use hasPart which is borrowed from CreativeWork to say
>> that
>>
>> {
>>   "@context": "http://schema.org",
>>   "@type": "MediaObject",
>>   "contentUrl": "
>> http://media.example.org/data/0/previews/Edinburgh_Streets.vrn",
>>   "description": "VRnow scene of part of Edinburgh streets",
>>   "duration": "T0M60S",
>>   "encodingFormat": "VRnow",
>>   "name": "Edinburgh_Streets.vrn",
>>   "hasPart": [
>>             {
>>               "@type": "ImageObject",
>>               "name": "A pic of Charlotte Square"
>>             },
>>             {
>>               "@type": "ImageObject",
>>               "name": "A pic of Princes Street"
>>             }
>>           ]
>> }
>>
>> On the Playground at *http://tinyurl.com/y95vhwdk
>> <http://tinyurl.com/y95vhwdk>*
>>
>> Your welcome Aaron !
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:37 PM Aaron Abbott <aaron@persuasivedata.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thad,
>>>
>>> I am meeting with my client tomorrow and will get as many answers and
>>> details as possible. I will try to get one of their lead developers
>>> involved on this thread as well. Thanks!
>>>
>>> As far as a clump of pictures, it's not like that. The clump of images
>>> are available, but the final embed is an assembled self-contained media
>>> object. An similar example would be the use of a SWF from and FLA if we
>>> were still doing Flash. Like I said though, let me see if I can get them to
>>> jump into the discussion, and if I can get permission to expose who they
>>> are.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the help!
>>>
>>>
>>> Aaron Abbott
>>>
>>> inbound marketing consultant | marketing technologist | digital media
>>> remixer
>>> website:     https://persuasivedata.com
>>> let's connect:     www.linkedin.com/in/aaronabbott
>>> *We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams...*
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sure that's fine.  But...
>>>>
>>>> I'd prefer to get other industry players, not just Aaron's 1 client
>>>> perspective.
>>>> That's all I am saying.  This has a impact on a large domain that is
>>>> already fast moving and going through rapid change.  Let's get those other
>>>> companies viewpoints as well.
>>>>
>>>> For instance, Aaron who is the manufacturer of this particular camera
>>>> they use ?
>>>> Knowing if it actually produces some metadata, or at least reviewing a
>>>> spec sheet from its objects can help us quite a bit.
>>>>
>>>> Is a clump of images for some VR usage really need to be labeled as
>>>> VirtualRealityObject ?  Or is this simply a "movie" or "set of moving
>>>> images" ?  That's what I am trying to surface.  Aaron is not really
>>>> providing some concrete details, and I'd like to hear from other
>>>> competitors in the VR industry as well for broader alignment if we are
>>>> going to start broadly.  (Hello Facebook and Google!)
>>>>
>>>> -Thad
>>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>>>
>>>
>>>