- From: Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 10:46:07 +0800
- To: Martin Alvarez Espinar <martinalvarez.espinar.ext@huawei.com>
- Cc: public-miniapps-wg@w3.org
Hi Martin, Thanks a lot for your hard work! Really appreciate it. Cheers, Fuqiao On 2023-08-25 21:56, Martin Alvarez Espinar wrote: > Thank you Fuqiao. > > Some comments on the minutes. > >> how about the reply to the TAG comments? > > In general terms, I think Baidu's proposal could solve the challenges > raised by the TAG. > > 1) Origin model: It's something similar to what I proposed at [1] --> > to specify a CSP (Content Security Policy) mechanism in the manifest. > So I think we can create a proposal based on a new manifest member to > specify the security restrictions. > 2) Tampering. We can have this as an alternative signature method. The > certificates may be stored in the package (EPUB does something similar > but in a concrete path, so they don't need to specify the path in the > manifest). I think it's feasible. > 3) ZIP container. This proposal, keeps the same format and enables the > user agent to download more packages from the server. This could > mitigate the challenge of large ZIP files. > > (I've posted these comments to the Github issue [2]). > >> there are some other issues [in the Manifest spec], specially the one >> about sessions > > I just closed miniapp-manifest#56 [3] about the sessions (based on a > merged PR to solve privacy review suggestions). There is another open > issue [4] with a PR to close it [5], related to Zhou Dan's comments for > preferences. Still open and needs to be reviewed. > >> … and the one about "req_permission" > > This is the issue miniapp-manifest#57 [6]. In this issue, I'm proposing > to use a common taxonomy for the permissions. I can elaborate the > proposal, unless there are objections/suggestions. > >> Components, Martin updated the spec, perhaps he can give an update in >> the next meeting > > Indeed, I'll be glad to do it. I updated the explainer and the spec > with all the suggestions received. > >> if we want to publish CR, we should have a test suite > > I will be able to invest time on these tests. I proposed a methodology > and documenting tools we can use right now (based on the one used by > the EPUB team), but tests are mostly "manual". So happy to use other > more advanced methods. > >> web app manifest will be discussed in TPAC > > I'll try to join the WebApps meeting to discuss the common parts, such > as the localization of members. I've already signed up. > > Best regards, > > Martin > > [1] https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-manifest/issues/42 > [2] https://github.com/w3c/miniapp/issues/195#issuecomment-1693329088 > [3] https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-manifest/issues/56 > [4] https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-manifest/issues/67 > [5] https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-manifest/pull/68 > [6] https://github.com/w3c/miniapp-manifest/issues/57 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Fuqiao Xue [mailto:xfq@w3.org] > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 5:52 AM > To: public-miniapps-wg@w3.org > Subject: [Minutes] MiniApps WG & CG Joint Meeting 2023-08-24 > > Meeting minutes are here: > > https://www.w3.org/2023/08/24-miniapp-minutes.html > > Fuqiao
Received on Saturday, 26 August 2023 02:46:10 UTC