Re: data model

I guess the conformance clauses can be split into two levels though - so
that some can claim parser conformance to everything except the data model
(in case there is an alternative data model which becomes popular, etc)
----
Stephen D Green



On 28 September 2012 14:32, Maik Stührenberg <
maik.stuehrenberg@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:

> I guess in this case, the spec should be split up into two seperate specs:
> one for the data model and one for the rest.
> However, in my opinion that would harm the overall benefit of MicroXML as
> it is at the current state: a self-contained short and feasible spec.
>
> Just my 2 cents,
>
> Maik Stührenberg
>
> Stephen D Green schrieb:
>
>  Would it be feasible for (say, in future) a version of the spec to
>> not include the data model? I'm thinking back to the way the
>> XML included DTD and how DTD became a bit odd to be in the
>> spec once XML Schema came to the fore.
>> ----
>> Stephen D Green
>>
>>
> --
> Dr. Maik Stührenberg
> Universität Bielefeld
> Fakultät für Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft
> Universitätsstraße 25
> 33615 Bielefeld
> Telefon: +49 (0)521/106-2534
> E-Mail: maik.stuehrenberg@uni-**bielefeld.de<maik.stuehrenberg@uni-bielefeld.de>
> http://www.maik-stuehrenberg.**de <http://www.maik-stuehrenberg.de>
> http://www.xstandoff.net
>