- From: Maik Stührenberg <maik.stuehrenberg@uni-bielefeld.de>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:32:57 +0200
- To: stephengreenubl@gmail.com
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
I guess in this case, the spec should be split up into two seperate specs: one for the data model and one for the rest. However, in my opinion that would harm the overall benefit of MicroXML as it is at the current state: a self-contained short and feasible spec. Just my 2 cents, Maik Stührenberg Stephen D Green schrieb: > Would it be feasible for (say, in future) a version of the spec to > not include the data model? I'm thinking back to the way the > XML included DTD and how DTD became a bit odd to be in the > spec once XML Schema came to the fore. > ---- > Stephen D Green > -- Dr. Maik Stührenberg Universität Bielefeld Fakultät für Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft Universitätsstraße 25 33615 Bielefeld Telefon: +49 (0)521/106-2534 E-Mail: maik.stuehrenberg@uni-bielefeld.de http://www.maik-stuehrenberg.de http://www.xstandoff.net
Received on Friday, 28 September 2012 13:33:32 UTC