- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 05:17:57 +0700
- To: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANz3_EbmWizekwGNbvz8jS+tD3HCK44NzktgNtEPBaVuSN2x6A@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks. I pushed the fix. James On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:50 AM, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> wrote: > unsure if these got missed or not; > > [23] char ::= s | ([#0-#x10FFFF] - forbiddenCodePoint) > > should be > > [23] char ::= s | ([#x0-#x10FFFF] - forbiddenCodePoint) > > and > > [26] controlCodePoint ::= [#x0-#1F] | [#x7F-#x9F] > > should be > > [26] controlCodePoint ::= [#x0-#x1F] | [#x7F-#x9F] > > J > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:51 AM, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > > I've moved the spec from the wiki into the W3C's version control system > and > > fixed it up so that it meets the W3C's CG publishing requirements: > > > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/microxml/raw-file/tip/spec/microxml.html > > > > Note that the spec is polyglot HTML/MicroXML. It's not valid (or > whatever > > the right word is) HTML5, because it doesn't have a DOCTYPE declaration, > but > > it is conforming MicroXML (according to itself). > > > > I think this is getting very close to the point where we could formally > > publish it as a draft spec; this would ensure it is linked to from > > http://www.w3.org/community/reports/. > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 22:18:44 UTC