Re: Design goal regarding HTML5

It's amazing what can happen if we have a worthy cause and
stick to it faithfully: Some people do respect that and will respond
to it very posititvely.
----
Stephen D Green



On 7 September 2012 03:39, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:

> Stephen D Green scripsit:
>
> > Should I detect here an aim towards a grand unification (HTML / XHTML /
> > XML) facilitated via MicroXML? That seems to me a very worthy cause:
> > Idenitfy those minimal changes needed to achieve such unification (what
> > needs to be removed from XML and from HTML to achieve convergence -
> > let XML drop things to get MicroXML and let HTML relax a few things
> > such as the DOCTYPE declaration and maybe the prefixes on attributes
> > in the SVG component).
>
> In my opinion, there is nothing we can do to affect either the HTML
> juggernaut or the XML monolith.  The one moves on regardless, and the
> other remains the same regardless.
>
> --
> Evolutionary psychology is the theory           John Cowan
> that men are nothing but horn-dogs,             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> and that women only want them for their money.  cowan@ccil.org
>         --Susan McCarthy (adapted)
>

Received on Friday, 7 September 2012 07:31:44 UTC