- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:41:46 -0400
- To: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Cc: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>, public-microxml@w3.org
Andrew Welch scripsit:
> Yep - out of interest, and sorry if reading the automatic namespaces
> page would make this clearer - why would we discuss something that is
> outside of the spec, doesn't affect the microxml document and is a
> post processing step?
Well, validation and transformation are out of scope too, but we have
mentioned Examplotron and MicroAF here. They give us something to point
to when people say "But what about X?", where X is something MicroXML
doesn't have.
--
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Fundamental thinking is ha-ard. Let's go ideology-shopping.
--Philosopher Barbie
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 16:42:10 UTC