- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 17:31:08 +0100
- To: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
> But no one has proposed that the *MicroXML parse* step would make any such > changes. Even if your skim reading was correct, it would not be applicable > because John made it clear that would be a separate step (i.e. a > transformation stage in the toolchain). So I think it was natural for me to > be thrown pretty badly by what you said. I noticed John was, too. I'm really poor at expressing things clearly in writing... (im tempted to say "but even so..... jeez" :) > Anyway seems we're all on the same page now. Yep - out of interest, and sorry if reading the automatic namespaces page would make this clearer - why would we discuss something that is outside of the spec, doesn't affect the microxml document and is a post processing step? -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 16:31:38 UTC