- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:12:52 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua2CVOP7OXc3qQGn14RgzGba+hmMvnXBrUcnmuX69MwrVA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:27 PM, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > 1. What character repertoire is allowed in names? So far there has been >> no demand to go past ASCII, but since I haven't noticed any posters who >> aren't primarily anglophones, I'm not sure that counts. Let's have more >> input here. Reasonable possibilities are to allow either just ASCII or >> the XML 1.0 5th Edition / XML 1.1 choices. The old XML 1.0 choice is >> also possible, but implementing it would be pulling teeth. > > > I think we should allow non-ASCII names, and the XML 1.0 5th Edition is > the best way to do it. > +1 I also think it would look really bad for a committee of anglophones to > decide on behalf of the non-English speaking peoples of the world that they > should use English for their element and attribute names. > *This!* -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 15:13:24 UTC