- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:56:57 +0000
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
>> Well, I absolutely agree that bottom-up work is required, either by >> the CG as a whole, or by its members individually, or by third >> parties -- preferably all at once. But given James's experience with >> RELAX NG (bottom-up) vs. XML Schema (top-down) adoption, I'd guess >> he'd be in favor of as much top-down push as we can get. I certainly >> am, and I trust the XML Core WG not to make a botch of things (I've >> been a member since its founding in 1999). >> > > > But perhaps a more relevant analogy might be xml 1.1 where it's not > clear that having the W3C REC stamp really had any noticeable affect on > the rate of adoption. Regarding adoption, a killer app could perhaps be a 'MicroDOM' it if offered memory savings compared to the traditional DOM for the same input XML... -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 17:57:30 UTC