- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:48:14 +0000
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
On 19/11/2012 17:37, John Cowan wrote: > Brian Kardell scripsit: > >> I disagree that this is necessarily a good thing - I think if >> there is a hope to pull this off it has to involve some "on its own >> merits" growth/uptake by a community lest it be viewed as being >> something handed from on high. I'm curious to hear James Clark's >> view on this... > > Well, I absolutely agree that bottom-up work is required, either by > the CG as a whole, or by its members individually, or by third > parties -- preferably all at once. But given James's experience with > RELAX NG (bottom-up) vs. XML Schema (top-down) adoption, I'd guess > he'd be in favor of as much top-down push as we can get. I certainly > am, and I trust the XML Core WG not to make a botch of things (I've > been a member since its founding in 1999). > But perhaps a more relevant analogy might be xml 1.1 where it's not clear that having the W3C REC stamp really had any noticeable affect on the rate of adoption. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 17:48:40 UTC