- From: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:42:10 -0400
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, public-microxml@w3.org
On 7/26/2012 8:16 AM, Dave Pawson wrote: > Which brings us back to David Lee's 'why MicroXML'? My envisaged use > cases are for 'simple' xml creation, by hand. Not presentation / > application / server processing etc? regards I've also got a faint hope that if this really catches on, it will eventually infect some of the existing XML data flows, too. Look what happened w/XML and SGML. Wasn't XML originally just "for the web", I think (correct me please I wasn't there)? I think Liam may have made this point before. Also there are other areas where I think simpler XML would be beneficial: the iPhone app developer who is choosing a preference file format: XML may not be suitable for use in a memory-constrained environment if it requires loading a large library to parse and/or build an object model, but a smaller lightweight one could open up this arena perhaps. -Mike
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 12:42:44 UTC