- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:16:04 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
On 26 July 2012 12:31, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> wrote: > On 26/07/2012 12:25, Dave Pawson wrote: >> >> I'd suggest that those using XML with CSS are equally rare? > > > > Presumably the point of microxml is to make it easy for people not > currently using xml to do so. If we only look for microxml uses where > people commonly already use full xml, there is little point in a subset. > > David Which brings us back to David Lee's 'why MicroXML'? My envisaged use cases are for 'simple' xml creation, by hand. Not presentation / application / server processing etc? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 12:16:35 UTC