- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 07:48:54 +0100
- To: MicroXML <public-microxml@w3.org>
David Lee said "A tradeoff here ... If we want to ease the translation of JSON to XML then having a wider character set available in MicroXML (aka Unicode) is useful. It is common (although wrought with problems) to try to translate JSON member names into XML element names. VS If the character set is wider then XML then MicroXML cannot be valid XML. Spaces are one annoying thing that JSON allows as member names but XML does not as element names." For me, transformation to and from json should not drive MicroXML decisions, since it is clearly not a loss free translation. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 06:49:21 UTC