- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:48:52 +0100
- To: "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
On 24 July 2012 15:36, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > What do you mean by derive? E.g. transform my uxml into html5? Using xslt etc? > > When I say "represent any HTML5 document", I am talking about data > models: being able to straightforwardly represent any HTML5 DOM by a > MicroXML tree. This is quite a modest goal. I question the scope of that statement James? "Any" html5 document may have all sorts of .... in it? I'd hope uxml is a subset of that? regards > > James > > On Jul 24, 2012, at 9:06 PM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Oh dear. >> >> On 24 July 2012 14:57, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: >> >>>> >>>> Why would you want to include xlink in MicroXML? >>> >>> I want to be able to represent any HTML5 document in MicroXML >> >> I disagree with this, as a goal. >> >> If I can derive (for some definition of derive) html5 from MicroXML >> then I would be satisfied. >> I'm pretty confident that James and John at least could do this, >> hence it's a step to many for me. >> >> Just my view. >> >> regards >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Pawson >> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. >> Docbook FAQ. >> http://www.dpawson.co.uk >> -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 14:49:20 UTC