- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:16:48 +0100
- To: public-microxml <public-microxml@w3.org>
On 24 July 2012 08:41, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > The list of issues to consider then becomes: > > - empty element tags eg <foo/> Remove , rationale, I have it with <foo></foo> .... or nothing. > - comments 0. Reluctantly agree, but accept the comments re complexity > - bare DOCTYPE declaration eg <!DOCTYPE html> Remove. For HTML5, can be added as part of an application layer. > - namespaces/prefixes on elements/attributes unsure. > - processing instructions Remove, complexity grounds > - Unicode names for elements/attributes Please include. We've ignored non ASCII users before. Is it a high cost for an implementer? > - allow > in attribute values for Canonical XML compatibility? No, based on simplicity. > - decimal character references tentative yes, include, rationale, I don't have a smart editor. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 08:17:19 UTC