- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 14:20:45 +0700
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>, "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:57 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > Void elements can be expressed as <hr> or <hr/>, but <hr></hr>, though > it does the Right Thing, is invalid. Worse yet, in the specific case of > <br></br>, the Wrong Thing happens: you get <br/><br/> in the data model. Sigh. I had forgotten about that. I see also issue 156 got closed without change http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/156 so new void elements like <hr> can be added. I am inclining to the view that the goal with respect to HTML5 should be just to be able to straightforwardly represent any HTML5 DOM in MicroXML (ie ensure we can represent the possible namespaced attributes). James
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 07:21:37 UTC