- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 05:49:45 +0100
- To: "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
On 24 July 2012 04:31, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > The ideal situation would be that MicroXML meets two requirements. > > 1. MicroXML can be used to represent any HTML5 DOM, and > 2. HTML5 validity for MicroXML documents can be specified at the > MicroXML data model level I'm having a problem relating 2. above to this "7. MicroXML shall facilitiate the creation of documents that are simultaneously well-formed MicroXML and valid HTML5" And later, James said he wants an nxml-mode type of editor option to support html 5 generation? A bit woolly, but I like the idea of 'facilitate the creation' either by some form of transformation, or perhaps (as with xslt) saying on serialisation that I want this microXML to be 'html5 valid' on output? I.e. html5 (whichever way it goes) is a feature of the output, rather than authoring? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 04:50:13 UTC