- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:09:40 +0700
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>, "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:53 AM, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > If people are happy with > that, then I don't think MicroXML needs any goals relating to HTML5, > and it wouldn't need a DOCTYPE declaration. This isn't quite right. MicroXML would still need to allow at least some prefixes on attributes (xml:, xlink: and xmlns:) so as to be able to represent the namespaced attributes that occur in the HTML syntax of HTML5. http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110525/syntax.html#attributes-0 James
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 05:10:28 UTC