- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 06:08:48 +0100
- To: "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
On 24 July 2012 05:53, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > Another mechanism to avoid these complexities is just to transform the > (Micro)XML into HTML5 at the final stage. If people are happy with > that, then I don't think MicroXML needs any goals relating to HTML5, > and it wouldn't need a DOCTYPE declaration. >From a user perspective I find this attractive. It also has the benefit of simplicity for microXML? I think that would also aid tool designers? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 05:09:15 UTC