- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:39:21 -0400
- To: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Cc: public-microxml@w3.org
Uche Ogbuji scripsit:
> > _unless_ you want all well-formed microxml to be well-formed XML
> > (which does seem to follow from the use cases on the wiki), and in
> > that case xml:space="collapse" or xml:mother have to be errors.
>
> -1. I think you raise the important issue of language in how we
> describe it. It seems we should not try to formally state that all
> MicroXML documents will be "well-formed" XML 1.0 documents.
Oh no, I think we should absolutely say so. A document like <root
xml:mother="sgml"/> is perfectly well-formed in both XML and
XML+Namespaces.
--
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Fundamental thinking is ha-ard. Let's go ideology-shopping.
--Philosopher Barbie
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 20:39:42 UTC