- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:29:55 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua2mpH8g-0EPBmvjkF4CwS5z6p=BzNFF6cowktU3NR9dGQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:53 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > Liam R E Quin scripsit: > > > This feels to me a bit like some of the XML constraints for > > compatibility with SGML... a note that xml:* element and attribute names > > are reserved, or should be used compatibly with XML, is sufficient > > _unless_ you want all well-formed microxml to be well-formed XML (which > > does seem to follow from the use cases on the wiki), and in that case > > xml:space="collapse" or xml:mother have to be errors. > > Those are not well-formedness errors in XML. It's just that if you use > them for your own purposes, don't complain when the gnomes of > Zurich^W^W^W^W > the XML Core Working Group repurposes them. > OK. In that case never mind my last message. It would be good at some point to get some sort of audit of any claim that ∀X ( μXML(X) → WFXML(X) ) -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 20:30:23 UTC