- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:08:23 +0100
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
On 16/08/2012 17:54, Uche Ogbuji wrote: > None of these refer to semantics. > > > Yes! This is a key, key point that some have missed in discussion. > Not missed. Just disagree that that is a good thing. I would probably be against xml:id in anycase but the argument against it would be weakened if the datamodel were extended to support ID typing. Allowing syntax that was added to xml _specifically_ to support ID typing, but not to provide the same typing mechanism is just leading to confusion. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 17:09:21 UTC