- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:35:42 +0100
- To: MicroXML <public-microxml@w3.org>
On 14 August 2012 16:31, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > Uche Ogbuji scripsit: > >> But you're just saying go back to XML 1.0, where an attribute has a name, >> and that name can include a colon, and there's nothing special in the data >> model about a name with a colon (except that "xml:" is reserved). > > That is what my draft says also. > >> I'd have to think about this, and in particular the consequence of having >> MicroXML documents not XMLNS compatible. You're right that we have not set >> XMLNS compat as a goal, but I admit that considering such a large break >> does give me pause. > > So it should; let us all think hard about this. Micro == simpler? xmlns isn't simple (see the various lists for proof of this). for me, No to xmlns compatibility. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 06:36:15 UTC