Re: MicroXML design goals

On 14 August 2012 16:31, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> Uche Ogbuji scripsit:
>
>> But you're just saying go back to XML 1.0, where an attribute has a name,
>> and that name can include a colon, and there's nothing special in the data
>> model about a name with a colon (except that "xml:" is reserved).
>
> That is what my draft says also.
>
>> I'd have to think about this, and in particular the consequence of having
>> MicroXML documents not XMLNS compatible. You're right that we have not set
>> XMLNS compat as a goal, but I admit that considering such a large break
>> does give me pause.
>
> So it should; let us all think hard about this.


Micro == simpler? xmlns isn't simple (see the various lists for proof of this).

for me, No to xmlns compatibility.

regards




-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 06:36:15 UTC