- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:14:41 +0700
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>, Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>, micro xml <public-microxml@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:06 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > James Clark scripsit: > >> I would want MicroXML documents to be able to include xml:lang >> attributes, but personally I would prefer MicroXML not to include a >> specification xml:lang. > > I originally thought so too, but I think it follows from the goal (which > is not written down, but which both of us have assumed from the start) > that the MicroXML spec be self-contained. I am not sure I see how it follows (assuming we are allowing prefixed attributes generally). From the MicroXML perspective, what's special about the "xml:" attribute prefix? Can we not treat it as just another prefix? James
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 15:15:32 UTC