- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:16:57 +0700
- To: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Cc: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>, micro xml <public-microxml@w3.org>
I would want MicroXML documents to be able to include xml:lang attributes, but personally I would prefer MicroXML not to include a specification xml:lang. On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com> wrote: >> One example of this is consideration of xml:lang. There is really nothing >> in the current goals that would preclude us from removing support for >> xml:lang, but I think doing so would be such a bad thing that it' worth >> capturing the essence in the goals of why that would be such a bad thing. > > Why would it be such a bad thing? > > Isn't this another thing that's better handled at the application level... > > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com >
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 14:17:50 UTC