MicroXML design goals

>
> On 14/08/2012 04:27, James Clark wrote:
>
>  At the moment, we have
>>
>> 1. The syntax of MicroXML shall be a subset of XML 1.0
>> 2. MicroXML shall define a data model as well as a syntax
>>
>> The best I can think of at the moment is to change 2 to:
>>
>> 2. MicroXML shall specify a data model and a mapping from the syntax to
>> the data model, which shall be substantially consistent with XML 1.0
>>
>> This is purposefully a bit vague, but at least recognizes the issue of
>> compatibility at the data model level.
>>
>
I've made this change:

http://www.w3.org/community/microxml/wiki/index.php?title=Design_Goals&diff=32&oldid=8

If anyone objects, please propose alternate wording.

It's time to adopt the design goals and move on from there.  They are
posted at:

http://www.w3.org/community/microxml/wiki/Design_Goals

Again, if anyone objects, please propose alternate wording, and reasoning.
 I'd like to close on the design goals by the end of next week.  We can
continue to work on other issues in parallel, but the design goals should
provide the fundamental context for those other discussions.

Thanks.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                       http://uche.ogbuji.net
Founding Partner, Zepheira        http://zepheira.com
http://wearekin.org
http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
http://copia.ogbuji.net
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
http://twitter.com/uogbuji