Re: Subset Data Model

• From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:43:00 +0100
• To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• CC: micro xml <public-microxml@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <502A0184.3080508@nag.co.uk>

On 14/08/2012 04:27, James Clark wrote:

> At the moment, we have
>
> 1. The syntax of MicroXML shall be a subset of XML 1.0
> 2. MicroXML shall define a data model as well as a syntax
>
> The best I can think of at the moment is to change 2 to:
>
> 2. MicroXML shall specify a data model and a mapping from the syntax to
> the data model, which shall be substantially consistent with XML 1.0
>
> This is purposefully a bit vague, but at least recognizes the issue of
> compatibility at the data model level.
>
> James
>



That seems like a good start,  thanks.
If I think of any wording improvements I'll post later.

David

Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 07:43:24 UTC