- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:50:53 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua3uF-qenVojAxwt935i0URvBZLsbuBDVAzOZNatDtbNeA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think there hasn't really been any dispute that uXML should be a > > syntactical subset of XML. Maybe we should wrap up on drafting the > > super-simple, largely sui generis data model towards which early > discussions > > have been hinting. > > I'd agree, were there a common understanding of the spec Uche? > IMHO there isn't. > > The questions and suggestions have gone largely unanswered by the chairs, > I'm > moving towards the opinion that uXML is not moving forwards. > I think I must be missing the questions and suggestions you have in mind. Can you enlighten me? -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Monday, 13 August 2012 20:51:22 UTC