Re: Subset Data Model

• From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
• Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:24:01 +0100
• To: MicroXML <public-microxml@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <CAEncD4d=TaAKe-=mUj_Ymy8FUxr6zy+JSsfZXx_dAsohwm7k+A@mail.gmail.com>

> I think there hasn't really been any dispute that uXML should be a
> syntactical subset of XML.  Maybe we should wrap up on drafting the
> super-simple, largely sui generis data model towards which early discussions
> have been hinting.

I'd agree, were there a common understanding of the spec Uche?
IMHO there isn't.

 The questions and suggestions have gone largely unanswered by the chairs, I'm
moving towards the opinion that uXML is not moving forwards.

regards



-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Monday, 13 August 2012 20:24:29 UTC