- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:05:25 -0400
- To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>, public-microxml <public-microxml@w3.org>
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 23:42 +0200, Jirka Kosek wrote: > On 25.7.2012 3:01, Liam R E Quin wrote: > > > But, losing xml-stylesheet and <?php?> might be too big a price. > > I don't think that PHP is argument for preserving PIs. I'm more trying to make sure there's a complete perspective than arguing a position - <?php...?> is widely used today, and that syntax was introduced in fact for XML use. > more complex scripts will step out from XML well-formdness anyway. Also often true. On the other hand, <?publisher page-break?> is also a strong use case. But could be equally well done with a comment. Liam > -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 22:06:19 UTC