EME LGTM
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 4:33 AM Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com> wrote:
> The Web Codecs part looks ok to me.
>
> Paul.
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:53 PM Joey Parrish <joeyparrish@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> EME looks good to me.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 11:26 AM Dale Curtis <dalecurtis@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> WebCodecs/MSE ones lgtm. Thanks!
>>>
>>> - dale
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:36 AM Chris Needham <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Media WG,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Our group's current charter ends on 31 May 2025, so we are now going
>>>> through the process to recharter. We'll likely need a short charter
>>>> extension after then end of May, which François is organising.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> François has prepared a draft charter:
>>>> https://w3c.github.io/charter-media-wg/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please take a look:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - Do the updated descriptions of MSE, EME, and WebCodecs look OK?
>>>>
>>>> - Are there any potential new deliverables to add?
>>>>
>>>> - Are the Expected Completion dates for each specification reasonable?
>>>>
>>>> - Are there any other changes needed?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the Expected Completion dates, in some cases these are based
>>>> on feedback from the spec editors (thank you!), and in other cases an
>>>> estimate based on the open issues and current level of interoperability.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For EME (only), we have continued our current approach of precisely
>>>> identifying the changes we plan to make, and requiring a recharter for
>>>> anything not mentioned.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Chris (for the Media WG co-chairs)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>