The Web Codecs part looks ok to me. Paul. On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:53 PM Joey Parrish <joeyparrish@google.com> wrote: > EME looks good to me. > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 11:26 AM Dale Curtis <dalecurtis@google.com> > wrote: > >> WebCodecs/MSE ones lgtm. Thanks! >> >> - dale >> >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 10:36 AM Chris Needham <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Media WG, >>> >>> >>> >>> Our group's current charter ends on 31 May 2025, so we are now going >>> through the process to recharter. We'll likely need a short charter >>> extension after then end of May, which François is organising. >>> >>> >>> >>> François has prepared a draft charter: >>> https://w3c.github.io/charter-media-wg/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Please take a look: >>> >>> >>> >>> - Do the updated descriptions of MSE, EME, and WebCodecs look OK? >>> >>> - Are there any potential new deliverables to add? >>> >>> - Are the Expected Completion dates for each specification reasonable? >>> >>> - Are there any other changes needed? >>> >>> >>> >>> Regarding the Expected Completion dates, in some cases these are based >>> on feedback from the spec editors (thank you!), and in other cases an >>> estimate based on the open issues and current level of interoperability. >>> >>> >>> >>> For EME (only), we have continued our current approach of precisely >>> identifying the changes we plan to make, and requiring a recharter for >>> anything not mentioned. >>> >>> >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Chris (for the Media WG co-chairs) >>> >>> >>> >>
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2025 11:33:41 UTC