Re: CfC: Adopt and Publish FPWD of WebCodecs

Hi everyone,

Sorry for the delay to confirm it but the CfC has passed and the WebCodecs
deliverable will be adopted by the Media WG.

The delay came because Google asked for some changes around registries
before a FPWD in the WG is published. If you are interested, the change is
being reviewed here: https://github.com/WICG/web-codecs/pull/149

After the change is merged into the spec, the FPWD will be published.

-- Mounir

On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 03:02, Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com> wrote:

> I'm late, but:
>
> I support adopting WebCodecs as a Media WG deliverable and publishing it
> as a FPWD.
>
>
> Paul.
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:47 PM Chris Needham <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> I support adopting WebCodecs as a Media WG deliverable and publishing it
>> as a FPWD.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Mounir Lamouri <mlamouri@google.com>
>> *Sent:* 01 February 2021 20:10
>> *To:* public-media-wg@w3.org
>> *Cc:* Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com>; Chris Cunningham <
>> chcunningham@google.com>
>> *Subject:* CfC: Adopt and Publish FPWD of WebCodecs
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Following group discussions during our call in December and exchanges
>> with the group chairs, W3C team contact, and specification editors, this is
>> a Call for Consensus (CfC) on adoption of the WebCodecs specification as a
>> Media WG deliverable and on its publication as a First Public Working Draft
>> (FPWD).
>>
>>
>>
>> The specification is available at: https://wicg.github.io/web-codecs/
>>
>>
>>
>> It defines interfaces for encoding and decoding audio and video. It also
>> includes an interface for retrieving raw video frames from
>> MediaStreamStracks. The specification matches the "Encoders/Decoders API"
>> entry in the Potential Normative Specifications section of the Media WG
>> charter:
>> https://www.w3.org/2019/05/media-wg-charter.html#potential-normative
>>
>> The CfC will last for two weeks and will end on the 14th of February
>> 2021. Please reply to this email and state one of the following:
>>  * I support adopting WebCodecs as a Media WG deliverable and publishing
>> it as a FPWD.
>>  * I support adopting WebCodecs as a Media WG deliverable but object to
>> publishing it as a FPWD (please detail your concerns).
>>  * I object to adopting WebCodecs as a Media WG deliverable (please
>> detail your concerns)
>>
>> The specification is currently owned by the Web Platform Incubator
>> Community Group (WICG). Effective adoption of the specification supposes
>> that the spec migrates out of WICG. See corresponding Intent to Migrate:
>> https://github.com/WICG/web-codecs/issues/130
>>
>>
>>
>> On behalf of the chairs,
>>
>> -- Mounir
>>
>