Re: Media Fragments - Video fragment temporal loop

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote:
> I would like it if Blink agreed with the spec, that's for sure.

Good. :-)


> I
> think that looping correctly is too much work to be worth the effort,

Just to confirm that we are on the same page: Looping should only be
done if a @loop attribute is given?


> but if you file a bug on the WHATWG spec we can discuss it there. IIRC
> Hixie already rejected the idea once, but I can't find that old bug or
> mail...
>
> Philip
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote:
>>> Blink just pauses when playing past the end time. However, HTML
>>> actually only integrates with the fragment start time (by setting the
>>> initial playback position) so I would argue that doing anything at all
>>> with the fragment end time is wrong.
>>
>> That would be a bug in the HTML spec - it should indeed pause just
>> like blink does, seeing as the end time is otherwise useless
>> information.
>> Would you agree? If so, we should register a bug on the HTML spec.
>>
>> Silvia.
>>
>>> Philip
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Leeroy <soupress@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I would like to propose looping of video fragments as well as entire videos.
>>>>
>>>> When rendering the following video element (in Chrome 33 and Firefox 27)
>>>>
>>>> <video loop autoplay>
>>>>     <source src="video.webm#t=00:00.000,00:04.395" type="video/webm" />
>>>>      Your browser doesn't support the <code>video</code> element.
>>>> </video>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I expect it to loop the portion of the video from the start to 0 minutes 4
>>>> seconds.
>>>> But instead it pauses at 0 minutes 4 seconds.
>>>>
>>>> If you can, please help me address this issue in the correct place.
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 07:06:47 UTC