- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:04:17 +0100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Cc: public-media-fragment@w3.org
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:28:47 +0100, Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> wrote: >> Thanks! Where is the spec being maintained right now? Neither >> http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ > > This is the latest version of the spec that has been published after a > group vote (in this case, the CR version of the spec). > >> nor >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/ seem >> to have been updated for over a month. > > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/ has > been updated today for example. Don't look at the date of the document > which is wrong. I'm modifying it at the moment. > Look at > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#valid-uri-spatial > to see the paragraph which has been edited. Found it: xywh=percent:a,b,c,d with a+c <= 100, b+d <= 100: the UA displays a spatial fragment with coordinates (in pixel xywh format) floor(a/w*100), floor(b/h*100), ceil(c/w*100), ceil(d/h*100) (the normal percent case). Unfortunately, the formula is wrong for the right and bottom edge, as ceil(w) != ceil(x+w) - floor(x), try e.g. x=12.5 and w=50: ceil(50) = 50 ceil(12.5+50) - floor(12.5) = 63 - 12 = 51 In other words, it is the right/bottom edge that must be ceil'd, not the width/height. -- Philip Jägenstedt Core Developer Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2012 13:04:44 UTC