- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:50:18 +1100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
Likely some tabular formatting and adding "xywh=" in front of the result makes the most sense. Silvia. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > Can you make that more readable? It's almost impossible to understand > what that means. > > Thanks! > Silvia. > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Raphaël Troncy > <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> wrote: >>> Thanks! Where is the spec being maintained right now? Neither >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ >> >> >> This is the latest version of the spec that has been published after a group >> vote (in this case, the CR version of the spec). >> >> >>> nor >>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/ seem >>> to have been updated for over a month. >> >> >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/ has been >> updated today for example. Don't look at the date of the document which is >> wrong. I'm modifying it at the moment. >> Look at >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#valid-uri-spatial >> to see the paragraph which has been edited. >> >> Best regards. >> >> Raphaël >> >> -- >> Raphaël Troncy >> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department >> 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. >> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com >> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 >> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 >> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/ >>
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2012 12:51:05 UTC