- From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:23:40 +0100
- To: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>, yl2@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Hi Davy, all, As a follow-up question, TC0081-UA [1] is marked as illegal… t=0:00:00. …however, it seems to _legally_ fullfil npt-hhmmss, as defined by RFC 2326 [2] (below). npt-time = "now" | npt-sec | npt-hhmmss npt-sec = 1*DIGIT [ "." *DIGIT ] npt-hhmmss = npt-hh ":" npt-mm ":" npt-ss [ "." *DIGIT ] npt-hh = 1*DIGIT ; any positive number npt-mm = 1*2DIGIT ; 0-59 npt-ss = 1*2DIGIT ; 0-59 Do you agree that TC0081-UA should be marked as _legal_? Note, TC0080-UA looks very similar (t=00:00.), however, it is indeed _illegal_, as there is no such concept as npt-mmss. What do you think? Am i misreading the spec? The trailing dot is indeed very confusing. Could anyone clarify? Thanks! Best, Tom [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/TC/ua-test-cases#TC0081-UA [2] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2326.txt -- Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc. http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 09:24:38 UTC