- From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:56:07 +0100
- To: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>, "yl2@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <yl2@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Hi Davy, > I think we should discuss what we understand as 'an implementation'. To me, > a parser is only part of a an implementation: you cannot check whether the > user agent correctly displays the media fragment. In other words, we cannot > fully test the Media Fragment Semantics [1] with a parser only. Any other > opinions? I agree. It must be applied. This is why I suggested creating a user script that makes use of the parser and adds media fragments support to any website. > Note that we already have two implementations that make use of Thomas' > parser: the NinSuna Media Fragments Player and the Synote Media Fragment > Player. The fact that your parser passes all the nasty syntactical test > cases is/will be directly reflected in the implementation reports of these > players of course. True, too. The better the parser, the easier the player implementors' lives. Things can still go wrong, though, but of course in general the parser quality is reflected in the player tests. The more players we have, the more chance that something wrong gets detected in the parser, though. Each player still has to cater for the low-level stuff like checking whether a spatial fragment is applicable given the video's resolution etc. Best, Tom -- Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc. http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 08:57:05 UTC