W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > June 2010

Re: ACTION-178: Review the complete document, remove unnecessary editorial notes before publication (Media Fragments Working Group)

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:11:38 +1000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinoYIzvxpTKm5shk3o2bMx8prYc-If1Q6Rf2lCp@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
Cc: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr, Media Fragments Working Group WG <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl> wrote:
> On 22 jun 2010, at 01:01, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>> We could also just introduce a section 5.x that would describe how it
>> can work with RTSP - I don't think there is that much to do, since all
>> the protocol stuff should already work - it just needs to be put
>> together (at least for the time dimension).
> I'm slightly reluctant to do this, at this stage. I think we should just say "it's doable". The guidelines about the meaning of media fragments should make clear what needs to be done.
> RTSP is really pretty much the same as file: here (and, actually, the same holds for mms: or any other scheme that could be used to transfer continuous media data).

Well, maybe then we should not mention RTSP at all?

Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 00:12:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:45 UTC