- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:45:39 +1100
- To: tmichel@w3.org
- Cc: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
The file that displays incorrectly (http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs/) is being delivered by the Web server as: Content-Type text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 while the same file from http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/ is being delivered as: Content-Type text/html; charset=utf-8 I think it may be a server setup for this file. Cheers, Silvia. On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > I have requested to Webreq (Webmaster) to fix this encoding issue. > http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs/ > Only the webmaster can fix documents on TR space. > > > The document was fine on publication (checked by webmaster and conformant to > publication rules). > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-frags-reqs-20091217 > > it is still fine, but curiously the alias done by the webmaster pointing to > the same document is showing encoding issues > http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs/ > > > Thierry > > > > > Raphaël Troncy wrote: >> >> Hi Philip, >> >>> I've hacked away at the spec and have something I want comments on. What >>> can I do to make it available for all to see, short of putting it on my >>> own webserver? Checking it in on a CVS branch seems sane, but would it >>> be possible for others to view the results? >> >> To clarify that: >> - the documents published in the /TR space if frozen and has been >> approved by the group prior to its publication (e.g. >> http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs/). >> - the documents published in our group space are evolving, non stable, >> they are our working draft (I need to change the css to show that), (e.g. >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/). You can >> change the later as you wish. Commit directly in cvs. Send a mail to the >> mailing list and make sure your changes are discussed by the group in a >> upcoming telecon. We can reverse back these changes if not approved. >> >> Raphaël >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 10:46:32 UTC