- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:41:51 +0100
- To: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr, "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Media Fragment" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:21:34 +0100, Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl> wrote: > Hi Silvia, > > Thanks for this very valuable report from FOMS. > >> After it was understood what the spec is about, it was suggested we >> split out those sections that are already stable and move those that >> are still in the works into a draft for later release. Thus, we can >> create a first, simple "versions" that can be implemented in full >> right now. > > I understand the need for the developers to be informed of what is > stable in a evolving spec and what is not, but I'm not a big fan of > splitting documents. Our charter tells what the 1.0 version should > cover. I would rather suggest we mark explicitly in our document the > sections that we consider are stable giving a clear 'go' to web > developers to start implement them and mark as unstable the sections we > are actively working on. I think this is a good idea, it's approximately how HTML5 handles the issue of sections with different maturity levels in the same spec. -- Philip Jägenstedt Core Developer Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 10:42:26 UTC