- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:08:57 +0100
- To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
- CC: Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
Dear Media Fragmenters, Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=20&month=01 year=2010&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 Actions opened: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open Best regards. Erik & Raphaël ------------ AGENDA Teleconference W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2010-01-20 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Wednesday, 20 January *10:00-11:00 UTC* Local time: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=20&month=01&year=2010&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 20 January 2010, 1000 UTC 0200 (West US) 1000 (Galway) 1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria) 1900 (Tokyo) 2100 (Sydney) Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99 Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152 Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG") Duration : 60 minutes ------------------------------------------------------------------- IRC channel : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C IRC Web Client : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html ------------------------------------------------------------------- Chair: Raphaël ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList Scribe: Guillaume (On Deck: Yves) Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by members and invited experts only. 1. ADMIN: * Roll call * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 13 January 2009 telecon: http://www.w3.org/2010/01/13-mediafrag-minutes.html * Charter Extension: ** ACTION-127: Yves to look for the charter extension * Next F2F Meeting: ** ACTION-128: Erik to poll Silvia, Conrad, Guillaume, and Michael regarding the new proposed date for the next F2F ** See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jan/0017.html ** Results (missing Conrad, Silvia, Michael, Guillaume): . Seoul (feb 23-25): 1 present (Erik) + 3 remotes (Davy, Raphael, Phiilip) + 1 absent (Jack) . Amsterdam (mar 8-9): 4 present (Erik, Davy, Jack, Raphael) + 1 remote (Philip) * ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers ** Target is MTAP SI on Semantic Multimedia, http://www.samt2009.org/sites/default/files/mtap_cfp_flyer_v1.pdf, Erik will circulate a draft version soon. 2. SPECIFICATION: 2.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves) * Bug in the npt specification found by Philip: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html "I'd also like to point out that the ABNF for NPT does not match RFC2326. It allows there to be 0 or more digits following the decimal point, while the MF ABNF allows 1 or more digits." * ACTION-126: Yves to follow up on error in ABFN for npt 2.2 UA Server HTTP Communication: (Conrad/Raphael) * ACTION-123: Yves to come up with ABNF for header syntax * ACTION-125: Michael to revisit his ednote in section 5 2.3 Media Fragment Processing: * Question of MF URI validity by Philip: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html * Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0015.html 2.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments: * ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names? * Davy's strawman implementation using ROE: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0014.html * Silvia's blog post: http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-composite-media-resource/ * Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism (ROE, MPEG-21) vs the semantics 2.5 Handling of 'Track' and 'ID': Conrad's proposal (Fragment header): http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fragments 3. TEST CASES: (Michael) * Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/ * ACTION-108: Michael to add the missing test cases in corrib * ACTION-115: Michael to come up with categorization of test cases wrt empty, undefined, etc * ACTION-118: Michael to come up with individual 'normal' test cases (+/-20) * ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications mailing list and notifications 4. IMPLEMENTATION: * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could implement the logic on client side * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the logic could be implemented on client side * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment * ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an implementation in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments parsing 5. ISSUES 5.1 Active: None. 5.2 Non-Active: * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at client-side * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases? * ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS) Sprites and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme? * ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register the fragment scheme for all media types 6. AOB -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 09:09:36 UTC