Re: ABNF or code fragments?

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:

>> in the foot if they want, but http://www.example.com/foo#%74=1 is just 
>> _not_ a media fragment URI.
>
> It's not *valid* (IIRC, "unnecessary" percent escaping is invalid per the URI 
> spec) but the current processing rules will handle this case as percent

Pointer?


-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves

Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 08:56:16 UTC