- From: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:17:48 +0100
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On 23 feb 2010, at 14:00, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > > Jack, it seems EBNF is being used by ISO > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_Backus%E2%80%93Naur_Form [...] Ok, there seems to be an EBNF standard, according to wikipedia: ISO/IEC 14977. Then EBNF is fine with me (as long as we refer to this standard). I had only heard the term EBNF being used in the generic sense (as used at the top of the wikipedia page: "EBNF is a family of metasyntax notations"). In that case: I couldn't care less whether we use EBNF or ABNF. -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 15:18:44 UTC