- From: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:16:54 +0200
- To: "'Yves Lafon'" <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: 'Raphaël Troncy' <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>, 'Philip Jägenstedt' <philipj@opera.com>, <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-media-fragment-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media- > fragment-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves Lafon > Sent: woensdag 9 september 2009 22:41 > To: Davy Van Deursen > Cc: 'Raphaël Troncy'; 'Philip Jägenstedt'; public-media-fragment@w3.org > Subject: RE: video aspect use case > > On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Davy Van Deursen wrote: > > >>> I've > >>> only been able to understand it as forcing the aspect ratio of the > >>> resource, rather than somehow modifying the resource (i.e. the > exact > >>> same bytes should be sent). > >> > >> Well, not exactly. Converting formats of unequal ratios is done by > >> either cropping the original image to the receiving format's aspect > >> ratio (zooming), by adding horizontal mattes (letterboxing) or > vertical > >> mattes (pillarboxing) to retain the original format's aspect ratio, > or > >> by distorting the image to fill the receiving format's ratio. > Depending > >> on the strategy, if done on server side, the server will not serve > the > >> exact same bytes ... and possibly save some bandwidth (needs to be > >> measured though!) > > > > In my opinion, different aspect ratio's of a media resource are > different > > 'versions' of one media resource and not different 'fragments'. You > can > > compare it with spatial scaling: as much as possible is done to > preserve the > > full content of the media resource. The latter is not the case with > > fragments, where you select specific things of the media resource. So > > shouldn't we just drop the aspect identifier? > > Well, that's the crux of the issue of using ? vs # in case of > transcoding > (and in the aspect ratio UC, it's quite likely to require transcoding, > with the existing formats). What I wanted to say is that, in my view, a different aspect ratio of a media resource is not a fragment (but a version). Since our task is to identify media fragments, I think aspect ratio is out of our scope. Similarly, we do not consider spatial, quality, or temporal scaling. Best regards, Davy -- Davy Van Deursen Ghent University - IBBT Department of Electronics and Information Systems Multimedia Lab URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 05:18:16 UTC