W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > September 2009

Re: video aspect use case

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 23:56:29 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830909090656i780d3994jad393affccd53fef@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: public-media-fragment@w3.org
Hahaha. :-)

So, would Silvia expect her TV to request a 16:9 version of her videos? Or
would it rather be that the TV understands from the media format that it is
a 3:2 video and does the necessary black borders by itself? I guess, I still
struggle to see why it needs to be a URI fragment parameter and what would
be expected to be done by the server as a reaction to that parameter.


On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/#scenario5.8
> [[
> Silvia's television is brand new and with a display in 16:9, however she
> has video on her media server that are in 3:2 format. To avoid paying a
> premium in network fees, she would like the television to request only what
> can be displayed to avoid wasting bandwidth.
> ]]
> --
> Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
>        ~~Yves
Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2009 13:57:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:27:43 UTC