- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:52:46 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
> The problem that we have is: without the "Link" header, there is no > relationship between the two resources. With the "Link" header, it's > almost the same as with the fragment and it turns from an unrelated > resource into a sub-resource / child resource / derived resource. I like the term 'derived' resource. I actually used it in my previous emails. I believe this term has not yet been over-used and its semantics should not be too misleading. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 09:46:20 UTC