- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:28:37 +0100
- To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Jack, > in the first example (2-way) you make the server return a different > range than the client requested, and also the range returned was nice > and ragged. With the second example, with all the nice numbers, could > something similar be happening too? For a documentation point of view it > might be a good idea to return those same ranges, unless there really is > a difference. Yes, of course, it is unlikely we get nice round numbers for the second example too. The main reason is my laziness and the fact that this all example is anyway staged. What I would suggest for the sake of documentation is to use a real media resource (on the jigsaw) server, describe a fragment request that makes sense for this particular resource, and see what time ranges (and byte ranges in the 2nd example) are actually returned. Can someone work on that? Cheers! Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 15:29:23 UTC