- From: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:09:47 +0100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On 5 mrt 2009, at 14:44, Raphaël Troncy wrote: > Dear all, > > I have made my stab on the description of the 2-ways and the 4-ways > handshake proposal. See http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/HTTP_implementation > > All comments welcome! I asked some questions (regarding the first > HTTP response code in the 4-ways handshake). The pro/cons need also > to be completed. In particular, I'm not sure about the cachability > of the resource in both cases? Raphael, in the first example (2-way) you make the server return a different range than the client requested, and also the range returned was nice and ragged. With the second example, with all the nice numbers, could something similar be happening too? For a documentation point of view it might be a good idea to return those same ranges, unless there really is a difference. -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 15:10:27 UTC